Efficiently programming large language models using SGLang

LLM Inference

Meta Info

Presented in arxiv:2312.07104. [ Code ]

Authors: Lianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin, Zhiqiang Xie, Jeff Huang, Chuyue Sun, Cody Hao Yu, Shiyi Cao, Christos Kozyrakis, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Clark Barrett, Ying Sheng (UCB, Stanford)

Understanding the paper

Background

• A single generation call = The process of taking a sequence of input tokens and generating a sequence of output tokens

• Programming LLMs = The development of computer programs that control the generation processes of LLMs

• The paradigm of programming LLMs changes

  • Single and straightforward generation calls → Multiple and interdependent generation calls interleaved with control flow

  • User cases

    • Prompting techniques

      • Basic: few-shot prompting, chain-of-thought prompting, retrieval-augmented generation

      • Meta-reasoning

        1. LLM initially generates multiple solutions through chain-of-thought prompting;

        2. It then performs meta-reasoning across these solutions to derive the final resolution.

      • Skeleton-of-thought

        1. LLM first generates a skeleton of the answer;

        2. It then issues multiple parallel calls to elaborate the skeleton into a detailed explanation.

      • Tree-of-thought

        • Integrate LLM calls within tree search algorithms (e.g., BFS).

    • LLM-based agents

      • The behavior of the agent is controlled by loops and conditional statements

Central question

• How to manage the multiple API calls of LLMs?

• A good system should include LLM state management, decoding process control, and smooth integration with external tools.

Key insight

Co-design both the front-end language (programming interface) and the back-end runtime

System overview

• SGLang

  • An embedded domain-specific language in Python

• Interpreter

  • Manage the prompt state and execute SGLang programs

  • Treat a prompt as a stream and submit primitive operations to this stream for asynchronous execution

• Compiler

  • Compiled as a computational graph and enable further optimizations

• SGVM

  • A custom serving engine/runtime

  • RadixAttention

Key designs

• SGLang Primitives

  • Enable the manipulation of prompts and generations

    • gen: call LLM generation

    • select: let the LLM choose the option with the highest probability from a list

    • extend or +=: extend the current prompt

  • Control of parallelism

    • fork: fork the current prompt state

    • join: rejoin the forked prompt states

• Compilation optimizations

  • Code movement for improving prefix sharing

    • Doesn't strictly preserve the original computation —— aggressive

    • Prompt GPT-4 to re-order graph nodes

• Runtime

  • RadixAttention

    • Utilize a radix tree (w/ efficient prefix search, reuse, insertion, eviction)

    • Least Recently Used (LRU) eviction policy

  • Cache-aware scheduling → Increase the cache hit rate

    • Key idea: Sort the requests by matched prefix length

  • Newly “extend” CUDA kernel

Implementation

• Approximately 9k lines of Python code

• SGVM reuses some components from LightLLM